Anat Hoffman: Who thinks that a woman wearing tallit is “provocative”?
“When I see a women wearing a tallit, it burns my eyes,” an Orthodox man told me during the course of my research on Judaism and masculinity. “It makes the synagogue seem Reform or Conservative, where women are trying to me like men.” The statement was and remains jarring for so many reasons. I wonder how a man, who presumably walks into synagogue to pray, can be so disturbed by the sight of a woman cloaked and engaged in prayer all the way on the other side of the mehitza. I wonder why a woman in a tallit has the potential to disrupt a man’s entire Jewish identity, challenging his own self-definition as “Orthodox.” The statement, though, about a woman “trying to be like a man,” which has repeated itself in countless discussions — in person and virtual — is perhaps the most troubling and the most telling. The entire discussion of tallit is ultimately about men’s perceptions of women, and of themselves, and a need to maintain a gender status quo.
Anat Hoffman, who was detained recently and questioned, among other things, about whether or not women “were wearing tallit” (my word!), addresses some of these issues in a recent column in the Forward, entitled, “What women of the wall want” . Was she being “provocative”? No, she was just trying to fully, deeply, connect with God. The question really is, why is such an action by women considered “provocative”? That is the heart of the issue here.
Women of the Wall is sometimes accused of protesting against the “status quo” at the Western Wall. In fact, there is no status quo at the Wall — things change all the time. Men and women used to enter the Western Wall plaza together through the Jewish Quarter’s Dung Gate; in 1994, separate, gender-segregated entrances were created. Within the past decade, women soldiers were still allowed to sing the national anthem during ceremonies at the Wall — now they are instructed to be content with mouthing the words.
People sometimes ask us: “When will you achieve your goal?” This is a question one asks of a general. A general has soldiers, uniforms and a strategy. With Women of the Wall, we don’t know whether 10 or 100 women will show up each month — though we hope for 10,000. We have no uniforms, as we are a pluralistic group and come from all streams of Judaism. As far as strategy, we are only as bold as our least brave member.
Simply put, our goal is to obtain the freedom to pray and to do everything that is halachically permitted for women on the women’s side of the mechitza. This includes reciting prayers together that do not require a minyan, and, yes, most of all, it includes reading from the Torah. (Though it has been many years since we have been able to read from the Torah in the women’s section at the Wall.) At a minimum, we want to be allowed to pray at the Wall for one hour each month, free of injury and fear. This should not be a provocative request.
Read the rest of her article here.

January 17th, 2010 at 8:40 pm
It is provocative, because people like Anat Hoffman are far from being “l’shem shamayim”. She is a politician and has been for years.
If I was the mayor or Rav of the Kotel, I surely wouldn’t have anyone arrested or such things. I think that is unwarranted. But please, spare me….this is all very provocative.
The Orthodox are the overwhelming number of “Kotel consumers”. Most non-Orthodox Jews could simply care less about the mehitza, and most of them don’t even understand the issues. I think most are willing to have the current set up.
Let’s see some everyday halachic commitment and not just when the TV is there.
January 17th, 2010 at 11:56 pm
Shmuel
I really think it’s unfair to judge Anat Hoffman the way you do. She is not a ‘politician’ the way Bibi and Barak and Olmert are. She is not a paid public servant and never has been. I think she joined the city council at the time for the same reason she is at WOW — to try and work for a better Israel and better society.
My point is that some men will see a woman in tallit — no matter who she is — and be ‘provoked’, and then blame the woman for provoking, and that this is patently unfair. It’s just wrong. We don’t judge men this way, and we should not judge women this way. Women should be given the right and space to worship and seek spirituality just the same way men are.
B’vracha,
Elana
January 18th, 2010 at 1:04 am
If the Orthodox are the overwhelming “Kotel consumers” it is because they make everyone else feel like they (we) don’t belong. I don’t know that it’s really true, though.I think that it’s just that since the Orthodox demand that their ways be followed at the Kotel, you can’t actually tell who there isn’t Orthodox unless that person is completely clueless or specifically refusing to play by the Orthodox rules.